Starbucks has opened a new store. Err – nothing new there. But this isn’t just another Starbucks; it’s a coffeehouse known as 15th Avenue Coffee & Tea.
Apparently, it’s the first of three remodeled stores in the Seattle area. Each store will be presented as a community coffeehouse, bearing the name of its neighborhood, rather than the coffee-shop giant to which it belongs.
You won’t find the Starbucks logo at the stores, but you will see the words “inspired by Starbucks” at strategic locations throughout the interior of the cafés.
The new coffeehouses will serve wine and beer, offer pastries, host live music and poetry readings and make espresso without the automated machines.
With a license to serve alcoholic beverages, the stores are positioned to capture a greater share of evening traffic. Makes sense, doesn’t it? Most of Starbucks’ revenue usually comes in during the morning and afternoons. Now, they can go after a greater share of the pie.
Starbucks says they’re experimenting with stores that have a stronger community personality.
Now, let’s be clear. This is just a test right now for Starbucks. They’re going to see how these stores do and then possibly expand to other cities.
And in my mind, it’s a worthwhile experiment and a brand move worthy of CHAMP status.
Neighborhood Loyalty
The first thing I thought of when I heard of this concept is Chicago, a town I always enjoy visiting. I like Chicago as a whole, but I especially appreciate that it’s a city of neighborhoods, each one with a distinct character.
One of my work colleagues happened to move to Chicago and he confirmed what I had already heard and come to know: locals know where to go in their neighborhood… for drinks, coffee, socializing, whatever… And not only do they know where to go, but they also hold a strong sense of brand loyalty to those establishments.
I believe Starbucks has the chance to foster a whole new set of brand loyalties with its neighborhood coffeehouse concept. They can continue to deliver consistency and quality, but with much more flexibility to deliver the compelling, distinctive environments and experiences consumers increasingly thirst. You can’t do that as a chain. You just can’t.
Unbranding?
Some say Starbucks is actually working to un-brand itself, but I don’t see it that way.
Why would Starbucks want to do that? The brand equity in the Starbucks name is too great. We’re not talking about a brand in tremendous trouble here. Profits may not be what they once were, but the Starbucks logo isn’t in any danger of going away and traditional Starbucks stores aren’t either.
I see a coffee powerhouse that’s recognized the value in going beyond a single brand. With its neighborhood coffeehouses, Starbucks can offer consumers something more. No longer confined to the cookie cutter model, new stores can be creative and offer an exceptional distinctiveness, all the while enjoying the full backing of the Starbucks brand.
I also don’t see this move as a departure from the brand’s essence. Sure, Starbucks is recognized today as a coffee chain. But serving as the neighborhood coffeehouse was one of the core ideas upon which the Starbucks brand was founded. Seen in that light, we might say Starbucks is returning to its roots.
So, I like Starbucks’ direction on this one. Do you? Is the neighborhood coffeehouse concept a champ or chump move? Share your thoughts.
I surprisingly hadn’t heard of the S-bux neighborhood concept. Intrigued!
A very interesting concept. I think I would have to visit a one of their new outlets to give it a more educated appraisal before judging the concept but consider this: suppose they went the opposite route with wine and craft beer then they did with coffee. By that I mean, pricing it reasonably. Upscale wine bars are nice but the $9 and up glasses of wine can be off-putting, especially with the new frugal consumer mindset. Suppose they sold glasses of good wine for $4 or $5 and craft beer similarly priced. That could be a winning concept and still be very profitable (if you have smart wine buyers). Starbucks moved the price of a cup of coffee from $1 to $4 during flush times and won. Now could it move the price of a good glass of wine from $9 to $5 during tight times and win big stealing market share from local competitors. Then, I think, you get to champ status.
Definitely a cool move, but I think its going to take some tweaking to make it work.
Neighborhood coffeeshops are successful because thats exactly what they are, neighborhoody. They are born out of and from the community. The baristas, patrons, poetry readers, and everyone contributing to the collective experience must be local and invested.
I love the community coffee shop because they’re one of the strongest examples of brand culture for me.
Starbucks is going to have to do more than just name the coffee shop after the street though. I would do a couple things:
1. Lose the “inspired by starbucks”. You don’t need it, its not going to help make your local coffee shop more successful – it might even hinder it slightly (as mentioned Sbucks does not have bad brand equity, its just not as appropriate here). People will eventually figure out its done by Starbucks and be OK with it. Let them figure it out after they’ve received and accepted the brand experience as authentic.
2. Crowdsources EVERYTHING. The music, poetry readings, even the food that is served. Make it local, from locals. Again, authenticity. Selling music from Jack Johnson at the POS ala regular Starbucks isn’t going to work here.
3. Un-sterilize the experience. I haven’t seen the stores, but today’s Starbucks is built as a totally different experience than your gritty local coffee shop. They’re different and the patrons behave differently and visit for different reasons. Don’t just make it feel authentic, MAKE it authentic, and then find a way to profit from it.
I agree with a lot of what Seth is saying. If they want to appear local, they can only do that by being local, not pretending to be. You can throw some makeup and disguise on and jump into the circus, but at the end of the day, everyone just thinks you are some clown.
Maybe instead of doing “Inspired by Starbucks” they can just simply say, “Serving Starbucks coffee”. That would basically say the same thing, I would think.
Pingback: It’s A Beautiful Day in the [Starbucks] Neighborhood | PR Nonsense
I love this idea! One of my complaints about Starbucks has always been how early they close. A coffee shop serving beer and wine is much more like a European cafe, which I feel is a good move.
I am going to have to agree and say CHAMP! What a wonderful idea, in my opinion. I like that they are not going to slap their logo on their neighborhood shops, I think that will take character away from them. You mentioned that some believe that Starbucks is “unbranding” themselves to do this, but I have to disagree, because I believe they are doing it smart by making this another project, rather than “Starbucks After Hours” boldly plastered against a wall. That seems far more commercial than having “15th Avenue Coffee and Tea”.
For me, every Starbucks experience is the same, the same coffee, the same atmosphere, etc, and I am not sure if I read this wrong, but it won’t be like this with their neighborhood coffeehouses? I say to stay away from the same experience in this idea, where each shop will have its own character, own style that fits in with whatever community it is in, even go as far as to provide local foods or specialties. That may not be so realistic financially speaking, but still I believe have a great affect.
Pingback: La Vida Local « On Brands
I agree with Seth’s points 2 and 3, and with everyone here that says this sounds like a great coffeehouse. In fact, I’d rather go there than go to a Starbucks. But that’s part of the problem with this move from a brand strategy point of view. To me, if feels like a short-sighted strategy aimed at improving near-term profits rather than building the brand over the long term. Potential pitfalls include being seen as trying to deceive customers into thinking it’s not a Starbucks (and I think this would only be worse if they removed the “Inspired by Starbucks” endorsement), and that the “local touch” will lack authenticity. My more detailed opinion, including links to some more articles on the topic, is linked above (through my name). Seems like I’m in the minority with my opinion, so feel free to stop by and debate…
Rob, your comments speak again to the observation by some that Starbucks is unbranding itself and somehow this is going to hurt and take away from the core brand.
I’m not sure that’s truly the case. This, to me, is more of a brand segmentation play and an opportunity to evolve the offering, not to mention a larger share of evening revenues.
I appreciate the pitfalls you note, and agree that execution of the local touch must be near flawless to ensure an authentic experience. We’ll have to wait and see on that one.
Will certainly stop by for your more detailed thoughts.
I’m with David on this one. There is much evidence to suggest that the Starbucks brand has peaked. As marketers, we shouldn’t condem Shultz for being aware of his brand’s position in the brand life-cyle and look to experiment with something new.
Tailoring your product to your audience is one of the basic principles of marketing.
I am a fan of the endoresment mark approach. I think this is not only more honest, but should, in theory, allow all the positive associations with ths Starbucks’ brand to be leveraged (I appreciate this is a debatable point in the eyes of some), while overlaying it with something innovative and new.
The important point is that there is something different in the customer experience in the new stores. The reports suggest that this is the intention, but the strategy will unfurl if it can’t be maintained. The organisation will undoubtedly want to leverage the efficiencies of its larger operation, for example in purchasing. If that also extends to recruitment and training, one wonders how different the customer experience can really be. Same coffee, same staff, same processes – will we essentially be left with only a change in decor?
I too have blogged in more detail on this topic. Putting the star and bucks back in Starbucks http://bit.ly/h8yrQ. Interested to receive comments.
Pingback: Brandimento » Reinventando a Starbucks
Pingback: It’s A Beautiful Day in the [Starbucks] Neighborhood | March Communications
Pingback: Brandimento » Blog Archive » Reinventando a Starbucks
Pingback: Brandimento » Blog Archive » Liquidated Logos
Pingback: Reinventando a Starbucks » Brandimento